Evaluating print and broadcast news in the San Francisco Bay Area from A to F.
Email to a friend | Printer-friendly version | Discuss Story

Remnick: Blame profit-seeking news media, apathetic public for poor foreign reporting

The 16th John S. Knight Lecture

The editor of America's hottest magazine, the first one to comprehensively detail the story of sexual abuse and torture at Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq, told overflow crowds at Stanford University Monday and Tuesday that the press failed to prepare Americans for the terror attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, and might fail them again.

David Remnick, the tall, tousle-haired, intense 45-year-old editor of the New Yorker, faulted both a news media preoccupied with trivial stories -- such as the trials of Michael Jackson, Kobe Bryant and Scott Peterson -- and a public that would much rather watch an episode of "Friends" than "Frontline."

Between the historic collapse of communism in Europe and Russia and that crystal September morning when al Qaeda pilots flew passenger-laden airliners into the Pentagon and World Trade Center, the American press had "taken a nap," he said. The former Washington Post Moscow correspondent and Pulitzer Prize winner delivered the 16th annual John S. Knight lecture Monday night. The next morning three other prominent journalists and a Stanford scholar responded to his critique.

The American media as a whole did not do its job as well as it should.

-- David Remnick, editor of the New Yorker

The events of Sept. 11 caught the press as much by surprise as the rest of the nation, Mr. Remnick said. With the end of the Cold War, foreign bureaus shrank and the media searchlight turned elsewhere. "How many reporters spoke functional Arabic?" he asked. "How many newspapers had ... Middle East bureaus? What background had American journalists provided on Islamic fundamentalism?"

Gathering news abroad is expensive, Mr. Remnick explained. It requires hiring reporters and translators, providing offices, transportation and language lessons. In an era when news executives consider journalism less a public service and more "non-fiction show business," foreign reporting was the place to cut staff.

The public must share the blame, Mr. Remnick argued: "The public bears responsibility for what it watches, what it reads and what it ignores." Americans, he said, are insular, little concerned with what happens beyond our borders. Few learn foreign languages. Few travel abroad.

Americans enjoy unprecedented choice of media content and work long hours, he noted. Perhaps out of a desire for escape, "we are not often enough eager for the serious." News weeklies "put Jesus or babies or back pain on the cover, or baby Jesus with back pain," he deadpanned, rather than international news because the former topics sell so much better on the news stand.

After Sept. 11, Remnick said, network television and newspapers "for a period of weeks, even months ... reported with dedication and intelligence. This was a change."

In the run-up to the invasion of Iraq in March 2003, Remnick said, "the American media as a whole did not do its job as well as it should." It did not discover how early the "arrogant and errant" Bush administration had decided to go to war with Iraq, or ask skeptical questions about the evidence behind administration assertions of Iraq's connection with al Qaeda or weapons of mass destruction.

Quoting Michael Getler, ombudsman of the Washington Post, Remnick said, "Almost everything we were told before the war, except that Saddam Hussein was bad, turned out to be wrong."

Remnick leavened his criticism of the press, saying its information-gathering capacity is not as great as that of government intelligence agencies. He also pointed out that European intelligence and political leaders, even chief United Nations weapons inspector Hans Blix, believed the Iraqi government had not come entirely clean about its military programs.

Turning to the future, Remnick said he wasn't sure whether New Yorker investigative reporter Seymour Hersh's stories revealing the torture and sexual humiliation of prisoners at Abu Ghraib would be a turning point in American support for the occupation of Iraq.

More certain, he said, was the damage to America's reputation and the loss of moral authority. Arab leaders, he charged, were taking advantage of popular outrage against America to suppress critics urging greater freedoms. "Even the U.S. banner of human rights has been lost at Abu Ghraib. In the eyes of Iraqis -- and those are the eyes that count -- we have lost whatever moral sway we once had."

What do you think? Discuss it in The Coffeehouse.


A project of the School of Journalism and Mass Communications at San Jose State University, Grade the News is affiliated with the Graduate Program in Journalism at Stanford University and KTEH, public television in Silicon Valley.

Monitoring the Bay Area's most popular news media:

Contra Costa Times

Knight Ridder

San Francisco Chronicle


San Jose Mercury News

Knight Ridder

KTVU, Oakland (FOX)

KTVU, Oakland (FOX)

KRON, San Francisco

KRON, San Francisco

KPIX, San Francisco (CBS)

KPIX, San Francisco (CBS)

KGO, San Francisco (ABC)

KGO, San Francisco (ABC)

KNTV, San Jose (NBC)

KNTV, San Jose (NBC)


Bay Area media advocates:

Media Alliance
Center for the Integration and Improvement of Journalism at SFSU
Maynard Institute
Youth Media Council
Project Censored
New California Media
Society of Professional Journalists, Northern California chapter
National Writers Union Bay Area chapter

Site highlights


The three-part series follows the rise of three Bay Area handouts:
• Part 1: At free dailies, advertisers sometimes call the shots
• Part 2: Free daily papers: more local but often superficial
• Part 3: Free papers' growth threatens traditional news
• See also: SF Examiner and Independent agree to end payola restaurant reviews
• And: The free tabloid that wasn't: East Bay's aborted Daily Flash


Lou Alexander started a firestorm with his original guest commentary predicting the company would be sold. Several other experts on newspapers have weighed in:
Newspapers can't cut their way back into Wall Street investors' hearts, by Stephen R. Lacy; Alexander responds
Humbler profits won't encourage buyouts, by John Morton; Alexander responds
Newspapers can't maintain monopoly profits because they've lost their monopolies, by Philip Meyer
Knight Ridder in grave jeopardy, by Lou Alexander...


Leakers and plumbers: There's no difference between a good leak and a bad leak? Journalists need a shield law. 11/22/05
Unintended consequences: How Craigslist and similar services are sucking revenue from faltering newspapers. 9/13/05
Is CPB irrelevant? As Congress moves to cut public broadcasting funds, has CPB become obsolete in the modern marketplace. 6/26/05
The paradox of news: There's more news available and its cheaper than ever before, but fewer young people are interested. 5/12/05


Most recent updatesHow the Bay Area's most popular media stack up.Talk about Bay Area journalism in our on-line discussion forum. A printable news scorecard you can use at home or in school. Raves and rants aimed at the local media. What would you do if you were the editor? Upcoming happenings and calls for public action. Let 'em know! Contact a local newsroom.Codes of ethics, local media advocates and journalism tools. Tip us off about the local media, or tell us how we're doing.Oops.A comprehensive list of past GTN exclusives.