Evaluating print and broadcast news in the San Francisco Bay Area from A to F.
Printer-friendly version?

Give the Examiner a proper burial

Next to the graveyard of American newspapers, where lie the remains of the New York Herald Tribune, the Washington Star and hundreds of other papers large and small, is a place that I think of as the house of the living dead. There newspapers with no detectable vital signs are connected to vastly expensive life support systems and linger until they are ready for interment.

William Woo

In my former city of St. Louis, the Globe-Democrat lasted in this trance-like state through two ownerships before it finally expired. Now here in San Francisco, after three years as a zombie under the Fang family, the Examiner has been bought by a Denver billionaire named Philip Anschutz. The best thing he can do is give the old soul a proper burial.

If Anschutz is determined to resuscitate the Examiner, if for no other reason than to make it a respectable tax shelter, the first thing he should do is change the name. Once the name was an asset; now it’s a liability, bringing to mind not vibrant journalism but a pathetic reminder of an honorable past. That’s not the way you want your paper thought of.

If he wants to challenge the Chronicle, my suggestion is the one-word advice given by Mark Twain when asked how to write humor: Don’t. The advertising base for two metros no longer exists. Advertisers will not split their budget when the Chronicle alone covers the market. To give San Francisco readers the news and features that the Chronicle does and more will require the reinvention of a modern metro daily. The lottery is a better investment.

If he wants to be a good community or local paper, he is in for more expenses than he can imagine. San Francisco is a city of nearly 50 neighborhoods, from Bay View to the Western Addition. To cover them well in a way that people will care to read about requires staff, staff and more staff. Good local news is the most labor- and cost-intensive journalism there is. To suck advertising out of the neighborhoods will require an army of good sales people.

What about a niche publication? Well, what niche and how to get people to pay for the product? Perhaps Anschutz has done his market research, though the bargain basement price of $20 million he is reported to have paid for the Examiner suggests otherwise.

In fact, there is a need in San Francisco and elsewhere for a new kind of serious daily newspaper. It requires a new vision, about which Anschutz’s ties with the old Fang organization are not encouraging. It requires a new business model based on something less than the standard piratical industry expectations of return on investment. It requires a deep respect for journalism and what it can be.

In the absence of any of these, it’s time to hold the wake, shed a few tears, toss down a drink or two and give the corpse a dignified burial. The old Examiner deserves to be put to rest.

William F. Woo is a Lorry I. Lokey Visting Professor of Professional Journalism at Stanford University and a former editor of the St. Louis Post-Dispatch. He is a member of the advisory board of Grade the News.

What do you think? Discuss it in The Coffeehouse.


A project of the School of Journalism and Mass Communications at San Jose State University, Grade the News is affiliated with the Graduate Program in Journalism at Stanford University and KTEH, public television in Silicon Valley.

Monitoring the Bay Area's most popular news media:

Contra Costa Times

Knight Ridder

San Francisco Chronicle


San Jose Mercury News

Knight Ridder

KTVU, Oakland (FOX)

KTVU, Oakland (FOX)

KRON, San Francisco

KRON, San Francisco

KPIX, San Francisco (CBS)

KPIX, San Francisco (CBS)

KGO, San Francisco (ABC)

KGO, San Francisco (ABC)

KNTV, San Jose (NBC)

KNTV, San Jose (NBC)


Bay Area media advocates:

Media Alliance
Center for the Integration and Improvement of Journalism at SFSU
Maynard Institute
Youth Media Council
Project Censored
New California Media
Society of Professional Journalists, Northern California chapter
National Writers Union Bay Area chapter

Site highlights


The three-part series follows the rise of three Bay Area handouts:
• Part 1: At free dailies, advertisers sometimes call the shots
• Part 2: Free daily papers: more local but often superficial
• Part 3: Free papers' growth threatens traditional news
• See also: SF Examiner and Independent agree to end payola restaurant reviews
• And: The free tabloid that wasn't: East Bay's aborted Daily Flash


Lou Alexander started a firestorm with his original guest commentary predicting the company would be sold. Several other experts on newspapers have weighed in:
Newspapers can't cut their way back into Wall Street investors' hearts, by Stephen R. Lacy; Alexander responds
Humbler profits won't encourage buyouts, by John Morton; Alexander responds
Newspapers can't maintain monopoly profits because they've lost their monopolies, by Philip Meyer
Knight Ridder in grave jeopardy, by Lou Alexander...


Leakers and plumbers: There's no difference between a good leak and a bad leak? Journalists need a shield law. 11/22/05
Unintended consequences: How Craigslist and similar services are sucking revenue from faltering newspapers. 9/13/05
Is CPB irrelevant? As Congress moves to cut public broadcasting funds, has CPB become obsolete in the modern marketplace. 6/26/05
The paradox of news: There's more news available and its cheaper than ever before, but fewer young people are interested. 5/12/05


Most recent updatesHow the Bay Area's most popular media stack up.Talk about Bay Area journalism in our on-line discussion forum. A printable news scorecard you can use at home or in school. Raves and rants aimed at the local media. What would you do if you were the editor? Upcoming happenings and calls for public action. Let 'em know! Contact a local newsroom.Codes of ethics, local media advocates and journalism tools. Tip us off about the local media, or tell us how we're doing.Oops.A comprehensive list of past GTN exclusives.