Evaluating print and broadcast news in the San Francisco Bay Area from A to F.
E-mail to a friend | Printer-friendly version | Discuss story

A grateful letter to the Mercury News:

It wasn't 'peeping Tom' journalism, was it?

Sex, lies and audiotape headlined the Mercury News on Aug. 11, Day 2 of a week-long Amber alert.

Dear Editors:

Thank you sooo much for all the intimate details about Scott and Amber's tryst. What a night! Champagne? Strawberries? "Going all the way" on the first date. And the sexy details -- Amber's red strapless gown and the skintight leopard print pants and red boots!

Your reporter slipped us right past the bedroom door when she wrote: "He seduced her by candlelight with the tip of a red rose caressing her face, and kisses cascading down her neck."


Such a welcome distraction from the New York Times with its gloomy stories about how American troops are entering a pivotal stage in their battle to suppress opposition forces across southern Iraq. That war will be going on for months, maybe years! Amber will only be on the stand for a week or two.

Plus when the Times or NPR reports on the presidential campaign, or how President Bush is rewriting mining or timber regulations for business -- I think it's the "No Nature Left Behind" initiative -- or when the National Academy of Sciences warns about California becoming a desert as global warming continues, I feel agitated. Like I should write my congresswoman or become politically active.

But reading about Scott, Laci and Amber requires nothing from me. It's great summer reading -- a sexy whodunit. How it turns out doesn't really matter.

I'm sure you cover all the stuff that matters too. But you don't push it at me on the front page. So I don't feel like I have to read it to be informed. Know what? You make me feel like I'm out of the loop if I'm not up to speed on the Petersons. Thanks for helping me avoid feeling like this story is a guilty pleasure.

Still, I have to confess. For a moment when I was reading about Scott and Amber's dalliance, I felt a little ashamed of myself. Almost like a peeping Tom.

the Mercury News wouldn't invade anyone's privacy unless there were a really good reason, right?

But it wouldn't be on the front page of the Mercury News day after day if it weren't something we all should be paying attention to, right?

I guess as long as it's in a courtroom, journalists can expose intimate details of an everyday person's life. In any other context, I suppose they 'd be sued for invasion of privacy or people would say it's unethical.

I think if you were reporting the details of my sex life, particularly my most embarrassing moments, I'd feel humiliated. But the Mercury News wouldn't invade anyone's privacy unless there were a really good reason, right?

I mean, if Scott didn't murder Laci, would he have ordered the champagne? And the strawberries and the use of the rose -- those were pretty telling. And if he tried to make his life seem more exciting than it was to impress a lover, well that ruins his innocent plea for me.

I too wondered whether Amber might be promiscuous. Thanks for anticipating my questions and describing her previous affairs. You guys and gals are real pros!

I feel a little bad about Amber's reputation. Assuming she didn't kill Laci, she merely dated a handsome guy she thought was available. But wherever she goes from now on, people will know she's been a sucker for married men. And strawberries drenched in champagne. I guess that's what editors call "news you can use." Wives will know to watch out for her, and for strawberry stains.

Reading so much about Scott and Amber has really got me interested in the trial. I don't have much time to spend on news, but every day there's the story on the front page saying "come hither." How can I resist?

Other papers have covered the trial, but you've been devoted to it. You've sold me! I've become so interested -- it's like a reality soap opera -- I've discovered how much is available on other media. .

I've found I can hear many of the same experts you quoted both on cable TV and our local stations' newscasts. And rather than seeing just photos of Scott and Amber and that clever lawyer, Mark Geragos, I can see them move and speak on television. It's so much more life-like. And easier than reading.

Your reporters are really good, but seeing Amber and that creepy Gloria Allred live on TV is even better. The emotion really comes through on the tube. Plus I don't have to wait a day to find out the latest juicy details.

Thanks to you I realize I can save a few bucks a week on my subscription to the Mercury News. And I won't have to lug all those papers out to the curb for the recycling truck! Thank you so much for opening my eyes to all the great journalism I can get for free.

John Q. Public


John Q. Public
Bay Area


What do you think? Discuss it in The Coffeehouse.


A project of the School of Journalism and Mass Communications at San Jose State University, Grade the News is affiliated with the Graduate Program in Journalism at Stanford University and KTEH, public television in Silicon Valley.

Monitoring the Bay Area's most popular news media:

Contra Costa Times

Knight Ridder

San Francisco Chronicle


San Jose Mercury News

Knight Ridder

KTVU, Oakland (FOX)

KTVU, Oakland (FOX)

KRON, San Francisco

KRON, San Francisco

KPIX, San Francisco (CBS)

KPIX, San Francisco (CBS)

KGO, San Francisco (ABC)

KGO, San Francisco (ABC)

KNTV, San Jose (NBC)

KNTV, San Jose (NBC)


Bay Area media advocates:

Media Alliance
Center for the Integration and Improvement of Journalism at SFSU
Maynard Institute
Youth Media Council
Project Censored
New California Media
Society of Professional Journalists, Northern California chapter
National Writers Union Bay Area chapter

Site highlights


The three-part series follows the rise of three Bay Area handouts:
• Part 1: At free dailies, advertisers sometimes call the shots
• Part 2: Free daily papers: more local but often superficial
• Part 3: Free papers' growth threatens traditional news
• See also: SF Examiner and Independent agree to end payola restaurant reviews
• And: The free tabloid that wasn't: East Bay's aborted Daily Flash


Lou Alexander started a firestorm with his original guest commentary predicting the company would be sold. Several other experts on newspapers have weighed in:
Newspapers can't cut their way back into Wall Street investors' hearts, by Stephen R. Lacy; Alexander responds
Humbler profits won't encourage buyouts, by John Morton; Alexander responds
Newspapers can't maintain monopoly profits because they've lost their monopolies, by Philip Meyer
Knight Ridder in grave jeopardy, by Lou Alexander...


Leakers and plumbers: There's no difference between a good leak and a bad leak? Journalists need a shield law. 11/22/05
Unintended consequences: How Craigslist and similar services are sucking revenue from faltering newspapers. 9/13/05
Is CPB irrelevant? As Congress moves to cut public broadcasting funds, has CPB become obsolete in the modern marketplace. 6/26/05
The paradox of news: There's more news available and its cheaper than ever before, but fewer young people are interested. 5/12/05


Most recent updatesHow the Bay Area's most popular media stack up.Talk about Bay Area journalism in our on-line discussion forum. A printable news scorecard you can use at home or in school. Raves and rants aimed at the local media. What would you do if you were the editor? Upcoming happenings and calls for public action. Let 'em know! Contact a local newsroom.Codes of ethics, local media advocates and journalism tools. Tip us off about the local media, or tell us how we're doing.Oops.A comprehensive list of past GTN exclusives.