Evaluating print and broadcast news in the San Francisco Bay Area from A to F.
Printer-friendly version?

Guest Commentary

Church sex abuse story lacks context

The lead story in the New York Times on Feb. 27th headlines with the following: “Two Studies Cite Child Sex Abuse By 4% of Priests,” and “Number of Victims Is Put in Thousands.” The opening paragraph begins, “Two long-awaited studies have found that the Roman Catholic Church suffered an epidemic of child sexual abuse…”

Patrick Mattimore

The San Francisco Chronicle ran the Times story and led with “Enormity of abuse by Roman Catholic priests revealed.”

Surprisingly, it is hard to glean from the Times and Chronicle a context in which to measure the extent of the “epidemic.” In fact, the authors of the studies are clear to point out that “…it is not possible yet to determine whether Catholic priests are more prone to molest children than any other professionals who work with youngsters.” In other words, there is no way of knowing whether priests are any more likely to sexually abuse children than teachers, volunteer sports coaches, Girl Scout leaders, nuns, rabbis, or “any other professionals who work with youngsters.”

It matters not. The Times, Chronicle, and other newspapers lurid coverage of the Catholic Church’s own self-examining mea culpa will anoint the public to once again crucify the Church.

When the country’s leading newspaper, the New York Times, publishes a sensational story, it has a responsibility to its readers and indeed, the nation’s news readers, to contextualize the story to the extent that is possible. A single sentence fragment buried amidst a 36 paragraph lead story complete with a companion article about the city with the highest rate of clergy sexual abuse hardly satisfies that ethical requirement.

The studies were commissioned by the American Catholic Bishops and according to the Times, “provide the most comprehensive examination ever of child sexual abusers in any institution.” So, the American Catholic Bishops, who have admirably opened the Church to inspection, have borne the cross that no other group wishes to carry.

The Chronicle continued its account Saturday with the following headline: “Clergy abuse report cites ‘homo-erotic culture’.” What makes the Chronicle’s account even more questionable is that the newspaper repeatedly quotes psychologist, Thomas G. Plante, a professor at Santa Clara University, to support the Chronicle’s view of the news. The Chronicle takes Professor Plante’s quotes wholly out of context.

Standing apart amidst those who would stone the priests is the San Jose Mercury News. On Thursday, the day before the John Jay Report on clergy sexual abuse in the Catholic Church was due to be released, an opinion in that paper warned, “Priests are not the only abusers.” The author of that opinion was Dr. Plante.

He suggested that the spotlight which the media was casting at the Church should also be shared by other groups. In the current frock hunt climate, other more salient information would be missed, cautioned Dr. Plante, specifically that “80% of child sexual abuse is perpetrated by family members” and that available research suggests “other groups who have access to and unsupervised power over children victimize children at percentages similar to those of Catholic priests…”

Dr. Plante makes it clear that he is not absolving the Church but that sexual abuse by priests should be kept in perspective, a lesson on perspective that was apparently lost on the Times and the Chronicle.

The author retired as the chairman of the social studies department at South San Francisco High School in 2002 and now writes about a variety of issues. His letters and opinions have been published in the New York Times, the San Jose Mercury News, and the San Francisco Chronicle.

What do you think? Discuss it in The Coffeehouse.


A project of the School of Journalism and Mass Communications at San Jose State University, Grade the News is affiliated with the Graduate Program in Journalism at Stanford University and KTEH, public television in Silicon Valley.

Monitoring the Bay Area's most popular news media:

Contra Costa Times

Knight Ridder

San Francisco Chronicle


San Jose Mercury News

Knight Ridder

KTVU, Oakland (FOX)

KTVU, Oakland (FOX)

KRON, San Francisco

KRON, San Francisco

KPIX, San Francisco (CBS)

KPIX, San Francisco (CBS)

KGO, San Francisco (ABC)

KGO, San Francisco (ABC)

KNTV, San Jose (NBC)

KNTV, San Jose (NBC)


Bay Area media advocates:

Media Alliance
Center for the Integration and Improvement of Journalism at SFSU
Maynard Institute
Youth Media Council
Project Censored
New California Media
Society of Professional Journalists, Northern California chapter
National Writers Union Bay Area chapter

Site highlights


The three-part series follows the rise of three Bay Area handouts:
• Part 1: At free dailies, advertisers sometimes call the shots
• Part 2: Free daily papers: more local but often superficial
• Part 3: Free papers' growth threatens traditional news
• See also: SF Examiner and Independent agree to end payola restaurant reviews
• And: The free tabloid that wasn't: East Bay's aborted Daily Flash


Lou Alexander started a firestorm with his original guest commentary predicting the company would be sold. Several other experts on newspapers have weighed in:
Newspapers can't cut their way back into Wall Street investors' hearts, by Stephen R. Lacy; Alexander responds
Humbler profits won't encourage buyouts, by John Morton; Alexander responds
Newspapers can't maintain monopoly profits because they've lost their monopolies, by Philip Meyer
Knight Ridder in grave jeopardy, by Lou Alexander...


Leakers and plumbers: There's no difference between a good leak and a bad leak? Journalists need a shield law. 11/22/05
Unintended consequences: How Craigslist and similar services are sucking revenue from faltering newspapers. 9/13/05
Is CPB irrelevant? As Congress moves to cut public broadcasting funds, has CPB become obsolete in the modern marketplace. 6/26/05
The paradox of news: There's more news available and its cheaper than ever before, but fewer young people are interested. 5/12/05


Most recent updatesHow the Bay Area's most popular media stack up.Talk about Bay Area journalism in our on-line discussion forum. A printable news scorecard you can use at home or in school. Raves and rants aimed at the local media. What would you do if you were the editor? Upcoming happenings and calls for public action. Let 'em know! Contact a local newsroom.Codes of ethics, local media advocates and journalism tools. Tip us off about the local media, or tell us how we're doing.Oops.A comprehensive list of past GTN exclusives.