Evaluating print and broadcast news in the San Francisco Bay Area from A to F.
E-mail to a friend | Printer-friendly version | Discuss story

Commentary

Now is the time for all good journalism teachers and students to come to the aid of their field

Students in the Bay Area Multicultural Media Academy
Journalism workshop stand with instructor Miki Turner
(second row, left in red shirt) at San Francisco State University.
(Photo courtesy Dow Jones Newspaper Fund Inc.)

It's that time of year when most journalism teachers are hunched over flashing photocopiers making handouts for the fall term. Their students are collecting the last care-free rays of summer or already standing in lines at the bookstore.

Time out! Your brothers and sisters practicing journalism need your help.

Many are demoralized, steamrollered by executives pushing for higher margins and marginalizing the most valuable kinds of reporting – stories that require time and talent to transform the complex or hidden into compelling journalism.

How are ivory tower egg heads and students who haven’t met their first real deadline going to redirect the corporate juggernaut?

By doing what they are uniquely qualified to do. And acting as if their futures depend on it.

Unprecedented pessimism

News people are not confident about the future of journalism.

-- Bill Kovach, Tom Rosenstiel and Amy Mitchell

Since 1995 the Pew Research Center has been asking a representative sample of American journalists whether profit pressure interferes with news quality. This May, for the first time, a majority said yes. Two-thirds of American journalists working at national media, and 57 percent of those working in local newspapers and stations, agreed that "increased bottom-line pressure is seriously hurting the quality of news coverage."

Half think journalism is headed downhill. They say the news is avoiding complex issues, too timid and increasingly sloppy.

"News people are not confident about the future of journalism," wrote Bill Kovach, Tom Rosenstiel and Amy Mitchell in a commentary included with the Pew survey. Mr. Kovach chairs the Committee of Concerned Journalists. Mr. Rosenstiel and Ms. Mitchell lead the Project for Excellence in Journalism.

The Pew survey paints a picture of a disillusioned journalism workforce, pessimistic both about corporate and public support for quality reporting.

Journalists need outside help

"What they are left with," the authors conclude, "are issues they cannot contend with alone. And they believe the companies they work for in the last five years have moved in ways that have only made things worse."

Journalism educators and students might seem an unlikely rescue team.

Journalism programs have generally avoided public criticism of news organizations, especially those nearby. You don't bite the hand you hope will donate to your building fund, or hire your graduates, or whose staff might teach skill classes as inexpensive adjunct professors.

A careful critique of today's journalism might also discourage would-be majors. That could lead to loss of resources on campus, such as faculty slots.

John McManus

Of course, all the journalism teachers and majors in the country won't be able to persuade news executives to put the needs of Main Street before the wants of Wall Street. That's why faculty and students must capture the public's imagination with a critique that activates consumers. That's where the power lies when journalism is market-driven.

Four reasons for faculty-student activism

Here are four reasons why prospective journalists and their teachers should publicly critique the most popular news media in their region:

• American journalism is increasingly driven by short-term economic logic. It seeks nothing less than to redefine news in ways that generate greater profit for owners, but may undermine the ability of citizens to participate in their governance.

That logic depends on selling the eyeballs of readers and viewers with good customer potential to advertisers. Which leaves an opening for consumer education. Were consumers better informed of what they should expect of news, and more demanding, then schlock might become less profitable and substance more.

That's a big "were." But consumers have learned to reduce tobacco and junk food consumption with help from medical researchers who widely publicized their results. Why, with help from news researchers, couldn't people learn to recognize and reduce consumption of junk journalism -- emotional, visual, simple but informationally barren fare.

• All of society will be affected by the prevalence of junk journalism. Those who aren't distracted from voting altogether are likely to cast uninformed or even misinformed votes. While everyone will eventually face the consequences, journalists and journalism educators will be among the first and most severely impacted if current trends continue.

As journalism loses its claims to professionalism and its reputation as a necessary condition for democracy, its justification as an academic discipline or field may be no stronger than that for insurance agents or Realtors.

• Journalism professors and students occupy a better position than most to evaluate news quality and help the citizens of a region do so as well. They understand, or should understand, the requirements of ethical practice as well as how to make information attractive to everyday people.

Many public broadcasting stations are located on campuses, providing a means of reaching the public without passing through the filter of corporate media -- which may resist efforts to increase public demand for more expensive, independent journalism.

• Systematic assessment of news can be an engaging learning experience for students -- whether journalism majors or not. Students seem to both enjoy and learn more when they discover the quality of news for themselves rather than reading some professor's critique.

The academic support system for the news industry can continue to mutter in the dark about the economic rationalization of news into an entertaining but irrelevant commercial product. Or it can heed the cries of its graduates and use its never-claimed authority to help the public recognize that just as junk food makes a body ill, junk journalism sickens a body politic.

Grade the News offers some tools to get students and faculty started. This fall we will be working with students at San Francisco State University and other Bay Area universities to refine just a few of the means by which students and faculty might help the public see through or more deeply into the news.

What do you think? Discuss it in The Coffeehouse.

WEEKLY UPDATES

More...
A project of the School of Journalism and Mass Communications at San Jose State University, Grade the News is affiliated with the Graduate Program in Journalism at Stanford University and KTEH, public television in Silicon Valley.

Monitoring the Bay Area's most popular news media:

Contra Costa Times

Knight Ridder

San Francisco Chronicle

Hearst

San Jose Mercury News

Knight Ridder

KTVU, Oakland (FOX)

KTVU, Oakland (FOX)

KRON, San Francisco

KRON, San Francisco

KPIX, San Francisco (CBS)

KPIX, San Francisco (CBS)

KGO, San Francisco (ABC)

KGO, San Francisco (ABC)

KNTV, San Jose (NBC)

KNTV, San Jose (NBC)

 

Bay Area media advocates:

Media Alliance
Center for the Integration and Improvement of Journalism at SFSU
Maynard Institute
Youth Media Council
Project Censored
New California Media
Society of Professional Journalists, Northern California chapter
National Writers Union Bay Area chapter

Site highlights

THE GROWTH OF FREE NEWSPAPERS

The three-part series follows the rise of three Bay Area handouts:
• Part 1: At free dailies, advertisers sometimes call the shots
• Part 2: Free daily papers: more local but often superficial
• Part 3: Free papers' growth threatens traditional news
• See also: SF Examiner and Independent agree to end payola restaurant reviews
• And: The free tabloid that wasn't: East Bay's aborted Daily Flash

FATE OF KNIGHT RIDDER NEWSPAPERS

Lou Alexander started a firestorm with his original guest commentary predicting the company would be sold. Several other experts on newspapers have weighed in:
Newspapers can't cut their way back into Wall Street investors' hearts, by Stephen R. Lacy; Alexander responds
Humbler profits won't encourage buyouts, by John Morton; Alexander responds
Newspapers can't maintain monopoly profits because they've lost their monopolies, by Philip Meyer
Knight Ridder in grave jeopardy, by Lou Alexander...

KQED-FM AUDIO PERSPECTIVES BY JOHN MCMANUS

Leakers and plumbers: There's no difference between a good leak and a bad leak? Journalists need a shield law. 11/22/05
Unintended consequences: How Craigslist and similar services are sucking revenue from faltering newspapers. 9/13/05
Is CPB irrelevant? As Congress moves to cut public broadcasting funds, has CPB become obsolete in the modern marketplace. 6/26/05
The paradox of news: There's more news available and its cheaper than ever before, but fewer young people are interested. 5/12/05

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Most recent updatesHow the Bay Area's most popular media stack up.Talk about Bay Area journalism in our on-line discussion forum. A printable news scorecard you can use at home or in school. Raves and rants aimed at the local media. What would you do if you were the editor? Upcoming happenings and calls for public action. Let 'em know! Contact a local newsroom.Codes of ethics, local media advocates and journalism tools. Tip us off about the local media, or tell us how we're doing.Oops.A comprehensive list of past GTN exclusives.