Evaluating print and broadcast news in the San Francisco Bay Area from A to F.
E-mail to a friend | Printer-friendly version | Discuss story


News media make crime pay

But risk losing public trust

The most important news of the day?

Not since Scott Peterson was arrested has such adrenalin surged in newsrooms around the Bay, indeed across the country. Hold the front page! Let's go live! Another celebrity murder in our own backyard!

Like hyenas our intrepid news corps has converged near the East Bay mansion of celebrity attorney Daniel Horowitz, feeding on his fame and the bludgeoned body of his wife. Overhead, news helicopters wheel like birds of carrion.

And news executives wonder why the public considers them jackals, worthy of the same esteem as opportunistic lawyers like Mr. Horowitz who himself monetized celebrities' tragedies.

The slaying of Pamela Vitale dominated Bay Area news media.

"HUSBAND SAYS SLAIN WIFE 'FOUGHT LIKE HELL' FOR LIFE" screamed the San Francisco Chronicle in a story that consumed 61% of news space on today's front page. The murder captured an equal proportion of the Contra Costa Times' front page, although the Times' headline did not let the husband frame the news in his own defense.

"Blow to head killed lawyer's wife" reported the Oakland Tribune in a story bannered across the top of the front page. "Wife's killing makes TV analyst the story," declared the San Jose Mercury News in a similar banner story. But that conveniently ignores the fact that it is the media that are making the TV analyst the story. (If you doubt this, consider how the murder of a non-celebrity in such a remote area would have been reported.)

Live and in the dark.

Coverage on Bay Area television was intense. Multiple stories. Aerial video. Even mistakenly reporting an arrest when none had been made in an effort to get a scoop.

Cable news satellite trucks with giant saucers were jostling for spots at the Contra Costa County Sheriff's Office. Celebrity anchors are flying in to "face" stories that others gather about the hottest whodunit since Natalee Holloway disappeared.

Giving the public what it wants

News execs will say the public demands massive coverage when celebrity and murder mix. They're only giving the public what it wants.That's the same justification the pornographer offers. Don't blame us. There's a ready market for the product.

But democracy doesn't depend on the integrity of the porn industry. Participatory government does rely on responsible journalism.

The murder of a celebrity's wife will affect the lives of only a handful of the Bay Area's seven million residents. For 99.9% of us, it's morbid entertainment. Its news value is near zero.

Distracting the public

When news media chose to make it the most prominent story of the day -- or month -- they distracted us from the issues that do affect our lives. They even obstructed justice by creating such a publicity storm that a judge declared a mistrial in an ongoing prosecution of a woman whom Mr. Horowitz was defending.

John McManus

People generally don't respect those who take advantage of their weaknesses, especially while adopting a posture of virtue. When news media encourage our morbid curiosity for their own benefit while putting on airs about their pivotal role in self-government (and claiming First Amendment protection against giving up their sources to prosecutors) they look two-faced.

We may devour these stories -- who could resist the voyeurism of how Scott Peterson bedded Amber Frey with champagne and strawberries? But at least some of us resent it when the media exploit our passions. Even addicts hate the pusher.

Broadcasters also violate a social contract. Television stations are granted free use of our airwaves while mere businesses like telephone companies must pay to rent them. That public subsidy is based on public service, not exploiting a market for the benefit of private shareholders.

Journalism cannot claim moral force and a special role above the rules, exempt from regulation and fees, while pandering to the public's morbid curiosity. As much as Americans love sensation, they hate hypocrisy.


KGO's Kevin Keeshan responds:

"ABC 7 News never reported the erroneous information about an arrest, which was, by the way, broadcast to the world live on Fox News by none other than Phil Bronstein of the San Francisco Chronicle.  I saw a KTVU retraction on their 10pm news Monday night.  I am not aware if there were any other stations involved.  I don't think we have been excessive in our coverage, devoting just one reporter to the story. There wasn't another story that suffered from lack of coverage because we had a reporter on this case.  Last night on our 6pm newscast we covered a variety of stories outside of the Vitale murder.  In fact, we spent as much or more air time on our coverage of Proposition 75 on the November ballot.  The Vitale case  is an interesting story.  But it doesn't dominate our coverage by any objective measurement." 

Mr. Keeshan is the news director at KGO, ABC7.

What do you think? Discuss it in The Coffeehouse.


A project of the School of Journalism and Mass Communications at San Jose State University, Grade the News is affiliated with the Graduate Program in Journalism at Stanford University and KTEH, public television in Silicon Valley.

Monitoring the Bay Area's most popular news media:

Contra Costa Times

Knight Ridder

San Francisco Chronicle


San Jose Mercury News

Knight Ridder

KTVU, Oakland (FOX)

KTVU, Oakland (FOX)

KRON, San Francisco

KRON, San Francisco

KPIX, San Francisco (CBS)

KPIX, San Francisco (CBS)

KGO, San Francisco (ABC)

KGO, San Francisco (ABC)

KNTV, San Jose (NBC)

KNTV, San Jose (NBC)


Bay Area media advocates:

Media Alliance
Center for the Integration and Improvement of Journalism at SFSU
Maynard Institute
Youth Media Council
Project Censored
New California Media
Society of Professional Journalists, Northern California chapter
National Writers Union Bay Area chapter

Site highlights


The three-part series follows the rise of three Bay Area handouts:
• Part 1: At free dailies, advertisers sometimes call the shots
• Part 2: Free daily papers: more local but often superficial
• Part 3: Free papers' growth threatens traditional news
• See also: SF Examiner and Independent agree to end payola restaurant reviews
• And: The free tabloid that wasn't: East Bay's aborted Daily Flash


Lou Alexander started a firestorm with his original guest commentary predicting the company would be sold. Several other experts on newspapers have weighed in:
Newspapers can't cut their way back into Wall Street investors' hearts, by Stephen R. Lacy; Alexander responds
Humbler profits won't encourage buyouts, by John Morton; Alexander responds
Newspapers can't maintain monopoly profits because they've lost their monopolies, by Philip Meyer
Knight Ridder in grave jeopardy, by Lou Alexander...


Leakers and plumbers: There's no difference between a good leak and a bad leak? Journalists need a shield law. 11/22/05
Unintended consequences: How Craigslist and similar services are sucking revenue from faltering newspapers. 9/13/05
Is CPB irrelevant? As Congress moves to cut public broadcasting funds, has CPB become obsolete in the modern marketplace. 6/26/05
The paradox of news: There's more news available and its cheaper than ever before, but fewer young people are interested. 5/12/05


Most recent updatesHow the Bay Area's most popular media stack up.Talk about Bay Area journalism in our on-line discussion forum. A printable news scorecard you can use at home or in school. Raves and rants aimed at the local media. What would you do if you were the editor? Upcoming happenings and calls for public action. Let 'em know! Contact a local newsroom.Codes of ethics, local media advocates and journalism tools. Tip us off about the local media, or tell us how we're doing.Oops.A comprehensive list of past GTN exclusives.